2011’s Insidious is a film that I mostly enjoy, at least enough to make it a part of my Blu-Ray collection. It has a few good scares, some decent acting, and a plot that I generally like…up until the ending when it gets cartoon-y on us. The cliffhanger at the end isn’t too bad, but the entire middle-end section that takes place in “The Further” is a complete joke. So coming off of that, I was never excited when I heard that a sequel was being made. How can you improve after leaving the last film on such a sour note? Still, like I said, the first one was still mostly good (for perspective, I would probably give it a 3 or 3.5 out of 5-star rating), so I saw the sequel, albeit with pretty low expectations…and what do you know? It is a much better film!
Insidious: Chapter 2 almost literally picks up immediately after the events of the first film, which is nice because it means that we don’t have to become acclimated to an awkward time jump. The story is that something followed Josh Lambert (Patrick Wilson) back from The Further when he went in to rescue his son – an evil entity that nearly claimed Josh when he was a child before his mother (Barbara Hershey) had his memories of the entity and of his ability to astral project wiped by Elise Ranier (Lin Shaye) and Carl (Steve Coulter). Josh must fight to maintain control over his body so that he can keep his family safe, but the struggle is greater than he could ever imagine, leaving no one safe from the spirits haunting his family…or from Josh himself.
Let’s start by pointing out the things that improved from the original: the character development is better here – Josh’s slow descent from loving father into spirit-possessed madman bent on killing his family is chilling – and the sloppily-compiled The Further has been embraced and bettered by using it as a means to explain some of the unexplained events from the first film and to tie it in more deeply with the events seen in the sequel. And, perhaps most importantly, the “Lipstick-Face Demon” is nowhere to be seen! The focus is less on scares here and more on good storytelling, which is always a relief. Seeing Elise return was nice because I did really enjoy her character in the first film, and using her to learn more about the demons/spirits made the story both more interesting and more emotionally scary.
The most impressive part of this film is that it is good from start to finish, which is more than can be said about its predecessor. Rose Byrne as Josh’s wife brings an emotional performance to the table here, but the best performance of the film comes from Patrick Wilson as Josh – he plays the character with such conviction that his gradual corruption is as heart-breaking as it is terrifying. True, the overall scares may not be as frequent or as intense here, but Insidious: Chapter 2 somehow manages to take the weak ending of the first film and turn it into something that works surprisingly well, weaving a well-crafted web of good storytelling and fascinating characters that makes me excited at the prospects of the hinted-at sequel focusing on a new family.
Rating: 4 (out of 5)
MPAA: PG-13 – for intense sequences of terror and violence, and thematic elements
Leave a comment | tags: barbara hershey, insidious, insidious 2, insidious chapter 2, james wan, joseph bishara, lin shaye, lipstick face, patrick wilson, steve coulter, the further | posted in 4, Entertainment, Film, Film Reviews, Movies
Over the past few years, I’ve developed a liking for the horror/scary/thriller movie genre, with Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining being a personal favorite. However, I’m not a fan of the blood-and-guts-style horror films that are so prevalent these days, so I’m pretty picky when it comes to which ones I’ll end up seeing in theaters. The Conjuring, directed by the director of Insidious (which I mostly liked), looked to be one of the horror films that was more of a on-the-edge-of-your-seat type of film than blood-and-guts, so I was quite looking forward to seeing it.
The Conjuring tells the supposedly true story of Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga, respectively), two paranormal investigators, as they investigate the haunting of the Perron family’s house in Rhode Island in 1971. The family has witnessed clocks freezing at the same time every morning, picture frames being knocked off the walls, legs being yanked by an unseen entity while the children sleep, and even mysterious figures popping up in the cellar or elsewhere in the house. The Warrens discover that the house has a past associated with a witch who tried to sacrifice her baby before confessing her love to Satan and hanging herself. The race is on to find proof confirming the haunting and receive authorization from the Catholic Church to perform an exorcism.
Every member of the cast does a great job, with the standout performances obviously coming from Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga as the Warrens. The two characters are Roman Catholics, a fact that is never shoved down the throats of the audience or presented as anything but two people who love and trust God. Their faith is never presented as silly or nonsensical, which is welcome after seeing many other films that tend to use Christian characters to poke fun at the religion. Another key performance comes from Lili Taylor as Carolyn Perron, the mother who is eventually possessed by the demon; the scene of her exorcism the most intense of the movie, with Taylor bringing plenty of weight and an incredible sense of anxiety to the screen. Though I have past acting experience, I can’t even imagine what kind of preparation goes into a role like this, but she pulls it off well and gives one heck of a performance. Shanley Caswell, Hayley McFarland, Joey King, Mackenzie Foy, and Kyla Deaver, the actresses who play the children of the Perron family, do a great job as child actors, bringing solid performances that are on par with the performances of their adult peers.
I really enjoyed the camera work in the movie, with the use of a still camera in calm moments contrasting with the use of a handheld camera in the more intense scenes; the latter technique works really well in a film like this because it sometimes contributes to your eyes seeing things that may or may not be in the background of the film, increasing anxiety in a powerful way. The filmmakers also place cameras in unusual spots at strange angles, giving the sense that you are watching the scene from the perspective of the demon itself. The setting of the film, a farmhouse in the middle of nowhere, is typical of this genre, but it never seems cliché. Props like an antique music box and antique piano are introduced early on, with me scorning the filmmakers for falling into the traps of clichés, but I must admit that I was wrong. While these items definitely do play roles in the film, they are not used in a way that feels stereotypical.
An unusual aspect of this film that is not typical of the genre is the Christian undertones. As mentioned, Ed and Lorraine Warren are devout Roman Catholics, so they approach their paranormal investigations from a biblical standpoint. Official approval from the Church is sought before performing exorcisms, the pair talks about how they were brought together “for a reason,” and the idea that it only takes a little bit of light to dispel a lot of darkness is presented strongly. The movie also stresses the importance of family in a huge way, most apparent in the climax of the film (which I won’t spoil here).
My only complaint of the film is that I expected Lorraine Warren to get possessed at some point in the film; it is hinted at pretty heavily, at least, I thought it was, but it never pays off. I thought that her becoming possessed could have added extra suspense to the film considering her role as one of the people meant to rid the Perron family of the demon. However, after pondering this for a while, I thought that the decision to keep her possession-free might not be a wasted opportunity after all but rather a testament to the power of God. Lorraine Warren contrasts with Carolyn Perron because the former is a practicing Christian while the latter is not, explaining why she was possessed and Lorraine was not. That being said, I still think that the possibility of the demon possessing Lorraine was hinted at too strongly for it not to have paid off. Oh well.
Anyway, as you should be able to tell by now, I quite enjoyed this movie, though it was certainly more intense than I expected it to be; I’m not ashamed to admit that I crept around my house with a flashlight upon returning from the theater the night I saw the film. It’s certainly not a film for the faint of heart…in fact, I’d venture to say that this just might be the scariest film I’ve ever seen, probably because its Christian undertones and biblical connections (Jesus drives out many demons during his ministry) hit a little close to home. However, being scared is the point of the movie, and The Conjuring does a wonderful job with that, bringing an emotional script, powerful performances, and a score by composer Joseph Bishara that could give you nightmares on its own.
Rating: 4.5 (out of 5)
MPAA: R – for sequences of disturbing violence and terror
Leave a comment | tags: demonologist, demonology, demons, ed and lorraine warren, ed warren, exorcism, hayley mcfarland, horror film, insidious, james wan, joey king, kyla deaver, lili taylor, lorraine warren, mackenzie foy, patrick wilson, roman catholic, scary movie, shanley caswell, stanley kubrick, stephen king, the conjuring, the shining, thriller, vera farmiga, witch | posted in 4.5, Entertainment, Film, Film Reviews, Movies, Music, Scores